Why does connecticut have a silent c

But Roger Williams had another mission in England on that occasion. The Puritan re-migration constituted essentially a revolutionary army gradually infiltrating into England from America, and carrying on the work of bringing in the new and revolutionary ideas into England, not as ideas imported from America for that would have been simply inducements to migrate to America, and might lead to the rational inquiry as to why these persons had returned if things were so ideal in America , but in the guise of ideas native to England, and based on English traditions.

Since it required that there should be an English leader, not a returned American pioneer, Roger Williams impressed his cousin, Oliver Cromwell, into service for that purpose. Although the revolt was primarily instigated by the Puritans gradually pouring into England from the Penacook region, and bringing Penacook ideas back with them, the English Puritans who had stayed home were also taken into the army, so that a general revolt was gradually organized.

In , after a civil war of many years, King Charles was captured and beheaded by the rebels, and the monarchy was overthrown in favor of a new regime headed by Cromwell, and called Commonwealth. The revolt, in many ways, such as the ideas of religious tolerance, the red color of its banner red, in the case of the Penacook Federation, standing for the red race of America , and in making some false starts towards overthrowing the feudal system in favor of the new economic order that was crystallizing in New England as the result of the mixture of English and Penacook institutions, indicated its American origin.

Yet, though the connection is obviously there, though the ideas were brought back from America by the re-migration, and though Penacook ideas of civil liberties were brought out by this revolt in England, there was no attempt to present the ideas as American in origin. Rather there was an attempt to present all these new ideas living up to English traditions. Even civil liberties, unknown in England, were so interpreted by a judicious explanation of Magna Carta.

For instance, the best known passage in Magna Carta at present is the passage which was translated at that time, for rebel propaganda purposes, as "Let no free man be taken or imprisoned, save by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers"; whereas the original Latin text would rather indicate that it was the judgment of "the peers" rather than "his peers" that was indicated.

The revolt not merely brought back to England some American ideas and introduced them there; it also gave the new economic system of America, the capitalist system, a first foothold in England, from where it later spread to the rest of Europe. The Puritan revolution in England, for instance, broke down the old guild organizations whereby trade and manufacture were monopolized by hereditary groups in a class known under the feudal system as the burghers or the bourgeois, and left those fields open for anyone who had the necessary capital; but nevertheless, it was mainly through that old class of the feudal system that economic power was actually taken.

Caste distinctions in Europe, taken over from the feudal system, have never broken down there; what resulted from this revolution giving power to the burghers, was actually an admixture of the American capitalist system, and the old feudal system, with a shifted balance of power, retaining feudal classes but breaking down to some extent their economic basis.

This tactics of infiltration has been a characteristically American form of starting a revolution, quite consistent with the methods of secrecy used by the Reds in conducting their fights, and not at all consistent with European fighting methods which called for open encounters. This method of slowly sending in an army in disguise stamps the Puritan uprising in England as American in origin, and particularly as of Red inspiration. New Haven. But not all the migration after the Pequot War was eastward.

We have seen that Lord Say and Lord Brook were given a royal charter to possess themselves of the Mohican lands along the shore west of the Quinnitucket River. The charter was granted in ; but it was not until , after the Pequot tribe had been massacred, that they had the courage to send over a group of Puritans to the mouth of the Quinnitucket.

But it was soon recognized that the colony would need a better harbor to maintain communications. This colony was different from the other Puritan colonies in many ways. In the first place, it was not in the least a refugee colony; and, in the second place, it was completely off Penacook territory, and not under Penacook influence. It was sponsored by a pair of English lords, and ruled very stringently by the church. So, when the search for a harbor was conducted along the Mohican shore to the westward, no sooner was a good harbor found harbors are plentiful along the North Atlantic coast than the Mohican village of Quinnipiack, at the head of the harbor, was attacked, captured, and taken over by the invaders as headquarters for their colony.

To make the appearance of an "Indian deed," a supply of junk that was worthless to both English and Mohicans was left with the red people who were driven out of Quinnipiack, as an ostensible purchase price.

And, to commemorate the "discovery" of the harbor they had been looking for, the colonists named both the town and the colony New Haven. The system of federation of towns was copied from Connecticut, but the towns were under a strong church government, as might have been expected the original Puritan settlements would have become, had they developed under official English sanction and without the influence of the Penacook Federation. The rule of clergy, strong but yet strongly challenged in Massachusetts, weak in the Plymouth Colony, and abolished in Connecticut and Rhode Island, was supreme in the New Haven colony.

Intolerance prevailed in the full form found in Europe, rather than in the milder form found in the Puritan colonies which came under Penacook influence. The New Haven coast being opposite the eastern part of the Great Paumonok Island, the northeastern portion of that island now called Long Island was also settled by the New Havenites, particularly those wishing to avoid the worst of clergy rule; thus that part of the North Shore of Long Island became a sort of refugee colony, but it was still an integral part of the New Haven colony, although some of those settlements joined the other federation of towns that was known as the Connecticut Colony, so that both New Haven and Connecticut colonies got a foothold on Long Island.

Another feature of distinction between the New Haven colony and the other Puritan colonies was in the severity of laws and penalties found there.

Indian word says nothing. What nation of Indian does this word orginate from? I am not well versed in east coast Indian nations so I will use others as examples. Does the word come from Cherokee, Choctaw, Illini, Osage etc. These are not tribes but nations. An example would be Europe is composed of different nations ; Germany, France, etc.

The same goes for American Indians. The Delawares were not related the the Nez Perce, they were seperate. But these nations had tribes within them. The final s of both state names was originally the plural morpheme -s , added to indicate that the words referred to a group of people, as in Apaches or Navajos. A morpheme is a separately meaningful, conventionally combinable linguistic element.

In the word pins , for example, both pin and -s are morphemes. The plural suffix -s is pronounced in English but not in French, and the French settlers of the Arkansas territory would not have pronounced it in the territory's name, which was recognized later by the state in Be it therefore resolved by both Houses of the General Assembly, That the only true pronunciation of the name of the State, in the opinion of this body, is that received by the French word representing the sound; and that it should be pronounced in three syllables, with the final "s" silent.

The "a" in each syllable with the Italian sound, and the accent on the first and last syllables, being the pronunciation formerly universally and now still most commonly used; and that the pronunciation with the accent on the second syllable, with the sound of "a" in man , and the sounding of the terminal "s" is an innovation to be discouraged.

In the case of Kansas , the last s is, for some unbeknownst reason, pronounced; the state of Kansas, like Arkansas, was also formerly a French territory.

Etymologists are not certain of the meanings of Acansa and Kansa in the native languages. The name Acansa was used by the Illinois to refer to the Quapaw tribe. The Quapaw whose name translates as "downstream people" lived near the mouth of the Arkansas River, and they did not use the name themselves, and it is doubtful that it was a complimentary epithet.

The Quapaw were also given the name Ozark , a likely derivation of French Aux Arcs , the name of a French post among the Quapaw that is a shortening of aux Arkansas meaning "at the Quapaw".

The pronunciation of Missouri —a word that is derived from French and Native American Illinois and that originally meant "owners of big canoes"—depends on whether you're a resident of the state as well as where your residency is. A similar residential phenomenon occurs in the name of the city of Cincinnati in Ohio.

The populace pronounce the i in Missouri as a long e. We recognize both pronunciations as acceptable. Sometimes you hear people pronounce the state of Hawaii as if the w was a v —and there is a phonetic reason for this. In the Hawaiian language, the letter w has multiple pronunciations. The reversed apostrophe in the variant spelling Hawai'i signals a glottal stop , which is the sound produced by a momentary catching and sudden release of air flow at the back of the throat. For example, it is the sound one makes between the vowels of the interjection uh-oh.